|
Prostitution
is the selling of one's body for sexual purposes. Today as in ancient
India, people considered prostitution to be ‘the lowest type of
livelihood’ (antimajīvakā, Mil.122). Because it involves
sex and the exchange of money, prostitution pertains to the third
Precept and also to the Buddha's teachings of Right
Livelihood. The issue of prostitution has to be looked at taking
into account the prostitute and the customer. Roughly speaking, there
are two types of prostitutes: (1) those forced into prostitution
by poverty or social deprivation and (2) those who choose to do
it because they feel it is a convenient and easy way to make money.
This first type of prostitute is called a harlot (vesiyā) or
a streetwalker (bandhakī) in the Buddhist scriptures while
the second type is called a courtesan (gaṇikā or
nagarasobhinī). The intention of the first is probably
just to survive and is therefore kammically far less negative than
the second whose motive might be greed, laziness or lack of
self-respect. The first is not willingly involved in wrong livelihood
while the second clearly is.
Now
what of the customer? Customers of the first type of prostitute are
definitely breaking the first and third Precepts because they are
sexually exploiting another person. The customers of the second type
may not be breaking the third Precept, but they are hardly involving
themselves in an activity likely to benefit themselves spiritually.
Generally speaking, prostitution is a sordid and unedifying affair
and sincere Buddhists would not involve themselves in it.
One
of the Buddha's supporters was a woman named Ambapālī who was a
wealthy courtesan of Vesāli and who later gave up her trade
to become a nun (D.II,95). In the scriptures we read of prostitutes
charging 500 or even a 1000 coins a night for their company
(Vin.I,268-9). |